Re: Refal+ abstract syntax

Subject: Re: Refal+ abstract syntax
From: Andrey Slepuhin (pooh@msu.ru)
Date: Fri Nov 26 1999 - 17:44:58 MSK

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Sergei M Abramov at home: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Previous message: Arkady Klimov: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• In reply to: Andrey Slepuhin: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Next in thread: Arkady Klimov: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Reply: Andrey Slepuhin: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"

Andrey Slepuhin wrote:

> Далее. "Not" все-таки относится к e.Statement и запись должна быть
> "Not" (e.Statement)

Или может быть даже
("Not" e.Statement)

• Next message: Sergei M Abramov at home: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Previous message: Arkady Klimov: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• In reply to: Andrey Slepuhin: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Next in thread: Arkady Klimov: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"
• Reply: Andrey Slepuhin: "Re: Refal+ abstract syntax"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Oct 25 2004 - 21:24:58 MSD